Understanding Gender Identity at Workplace for Professional Occupations
Keywords:
Identity, Identity Formation, Gender Stereotyping, Social Construction.Abstract
The paper studies the concept of gender identity at work through certain attributes in professional occupations. These attributes are rated by the respondents as characteristics for professional men, professional women and if those attributes are required to be successful in the profession. It tries to understand if men and women are rated similarly or differently on those traits and if there is some identity gap or presence of certain stereotypical attitudes in the professions. It is important to understand these through hypothesis testing as there is still some biasness and association of stereotypical behaviour which ultimately affect the diversity in the organisation. The statistical analysis reveals that not all attributes are viewed as similar for men and women. It also identifies some attributes particularly significant for professional men and women. There is no clear evidence of stereotypical behaviour in the professions under study. However, the results cannot be generalised because of some limitations.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
• The attributes could have been divided in categories in order to understand which category Variation in the Hiring of Women: Evidence from Law Firms. American Sociological Review, 70(4), 702-728. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4145383.
• Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (4), 764–791. doi: 10.2307/2667055 .
• Kroger, J. (1997). Gender and identity: The intersection of structure, content and context. Sex Roles, 11/12 , 747–770. doi: 10.1023/A:1025627.206676 .
• Lane, V. R., & Scott, S. G. (2007). The neural network model of organizational identification. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104 , 175–192. doi: 10.1016/j.ob-hdp.2007.04.004
• Martin, P., & Barnard, A. (2013). The experience of women in male dominated occupations: A constructivist grounded theory inquiry. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 39(2), doi:10.4102/sajip.v39i2.1099
• Ravishankar, M. N., & Pan, S. L. (2008). The influence of organisational identification on organizational knowledge management (KM). The International Journal of Management Science,Omega, 36 , 221–234. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.06.006 .
• Schein, V. E. 1978. Sex role stereotyping, ability and performance: Prior research and new directions. Personnel Psychology, 31, 259-268. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1978.tb00445.x
• Schein, V., Mueller, R., Lituchy, T., & Liu, J. (1996). Think Manager -- Think Male: A Global Phenomenon? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(1), 33-41. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2488533
• Schein, V., & Mueller, R. (1992). Sex Role Stereotyping and Requisite Management Characteristics: A Cross Cultural Look. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(5), 439-447. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2488396
• Stets, J. E. (2005). Examining emotions in identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68 (1), 39–74. doi: 10.1177/019027250506800104 .
• Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63 (4), 284–297. doi: 10.2307/2695840 .
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
• Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.
• Wass, V. and McNabb, R.(2006). Pay, promotion and parenthood amongst women solicitors. Work, Employment & Society, 20(2), 289-308. doi:10.1177/09500170060641 15.